advantages and disadvantages of charismatic leadership pdf

Advantages And Disadvantages Of Charismatic Leadership Pdf

File Name: advantages and disadvantages of charismatic leadership .zip
Size: 1089Kb
Published: 07.06.2021

Leaders follow various leadership styles to achieve success and maintain excellent company culture in their organizations. In this fast-paced corporate world, things are bound to evolve, and so do leadership qualities. Out of multiple tyoes of leadership, the charismatic leadership style is designed to inspire people and influence employees to do their best work possible. It helps employees improve their communication skills , enhance productivity , boost performance and foster team-bonding opportunities. These leaders inspired people throughout their lives, and how?

Advantages And Disadvantages Of Charismatic Leadership

Instead you have to inspire the next guy down the line and get him to inspire his people. The almost-indescribable characteristic is something we associate with other leaders, while we consider some people simply lacking it. More often than not, charismatic leaders are considered powerful orators with a clear vision.

But what is charismatic leadership about? Charisma is a trait often associated with leaders and the world is full of examples of people being described as charismatic leaders. The term charismatic comes from the ancient Greek word charis , which means grace , kindness and life.

Charismatic people are considered as graceful and virtuous. The idea of a strong and noble leader, who relies on personal characteristics, has been present in history. People have attributed and associated great personalities with the ability to rule in a good manner ever since the dawn of time.

In terms of crafting a proper leadership theory, the two biggest influencing theories behind charismatic theory have been developed by Max Weber and Robert J. The German sociologist explored the reasons people follow authority and the findings were published posthumously in in Economy and Society. Weber moved away from the classical thinking that authority is achieved through the three routes:. Instead, Weber thought people follow a leader or a state because they evaluate the authority and perceive it good, right or just form of power.

From the above ideas, Weber distinguished three models of legitimate leadership, summed up in the below image :. Charismatic leaders are almost savior like and people follow them as they are perceived to put things right.

There is the psychological dimension , which refers to the inner qualities of the leader. The second dimension is about the social aspect. This could be the cultural influence of society, family, work or even education. Charisma essentially takes on a traditional form and legitimizes its source.

The impersonal nature of charisma implies that it can be taught, according to Weber. A leader has to prove his or her worth and the charisma in order to continue to enjoy legitimacy.

Charismatic leadership is therefore relational because the subordinates can withdraw their support, leading the leader without legitimacy to rule. This was because it changed the system it was operating in and removed the traditional justification of authority around it.

According to Weber, charismatic leadership would be hard to routinize and therefore, it created succession issues in organizations or the state. Interested in learning why we as humans are prone to falling for charismatic leaders?

Watch this TED talk. In , Robert J. House published his working paper A theory of charismatic leadership , which aimed to move the theory to a more testable concept. House moved the charismatic leadership theory more towards a psychological explanation, rather than a sociological or political science theory of power. To communicate the vision to subordinates, charismatic leaders need to showcase high levels of self-confidence, dominance, influence and strong conviction.

These assumptions and characteristics will be discussed further in the following sections. Instead, House looked more towards the behaviors and the situational factors that influence the effectiveness of charismatic leaders. The above two theories have largely shaped the conversation around charismatic leadership, providing the theory with context and testable characteristics.

The two theories, along with other research on the leadership model, have revived the trait-based approach to leadership. Since charismatic leadership is linked with personal traits and the transformation of subordinates, the current conversation around the model often links it with transformational leadership theory. Both of these theories seek radical changes around the organizational structure they operate in, yet there are certain important differences between the two.

Furthermore, transformational leadership always has change at the heart of it, whereas charismatic leadership might not be interested in changing the operational structure of the organization. Nonetheless, in current literature, charismatic leadership has assumed a more benevolent approach to leadership. Instead of focusing on a strong moral conviction and the personality traits of the leader, the inclusion of transformational elements has added a behavior element to the theory.

In , J. Pastor, M. Mayo and B. Ronald E. Riggio, PhD and professor of leadership and organizational psychology, summed up the current idea of charismatic leadership well in his article. The above touched on the context and approach to charismatic leadership.

The assumptions rely on the idea that charismatic leadership relies on the behavioral, situational and organizational factors. First, charismatic leadership requires the leader to showcase behaviors, which create an impression of competence and success.

In short, the leadership requires a strong goal articulation. The speech and idea provided subordinates a vision of the future, the leader would want them to accomplish together. According to House, the goal articulation is more often about ideology rather than pragmatism. For successful goal articulation to appear, a charismatic leadership theory requires the use of motive arousal.

This means the goal and vision put forward by the leader must create an emotional appeal and spark off the right type of motivational response. House points out to the example of military leaders, who use authoritarian symbolism and images of the enemy in order to excite the followers.

House summarized studies, which had found the following assumptions:. Finally, charismatic leadership requires specific situational determinants. For Weber, charismatic leadership is born out of a stressful situation. An example could be Mahatma Ghandi in India during the Indian independence movement. In a business environment a failing company might benefit from a charismatic leader who creates a vision of a better future for subordinates.

But stressful disasters are not the only situational determinant charismatic leadership can use as an advantage. For the above characteristics of charismatic leadership to work efficiently, the behavior of the leader must be aligned with the assumptions.

Charismatic leadership model emphasizes the behavioral assumptions as the key. As mentioned in the previous section, House outlined the four qualities of a charismatic leader. These were:. Interestingly, charismatic leaders are not just interested or relying on showcasing the above qualities themselves, but rather they behave in a way that supports role-modeling behavior.

Essentially this means charismatic leadership wants subordinates to adopt the behaviour of the leader. Role-modeling has been shown by studies to have a strong effect on influencing other people. An authoritative figure can get subjects to administer pain to other people and people can adopt biased or racist attitudes from leaders. But naturally, role-modeling could be used for positive change and behavior as well. In a corporate environment, role-modeling could work as a method of improving employee motivation.

From the above idea follows another crucial behavioral aspect of the charismatic leader. The leader should focus on engaging in behaviors, which create the impression of competence and success. Weber mentioned in his book how charismatic leaders are required to prove their power to the subordinates. While accomplishments are generally the easiest way to do this, the idea of appearance will also help charismatic leaders.

This appearance assumption links closely with the above idea of goal articulation. The best way to create the impression is often through high expectations and strong self-confidence.

Studies have shown your self-esteem level and the expectation of being able to achieve a goal relate to motivation and goal attainment. The behavioral assumption is associated with the above motive arousal. As shown earlier, specific tasks require the leader to use specific motivational influences in order to get the best out of subordinates.

Furthermore, House drew two hypotheses out of the assumptions:. Therefore, charismatic leadership works most efficiently when leaders are able to instill confidence and self-esteem to subordinates, which means subordinates are more inclined to achieve objectives and thus trust the leader further. Since charismatic leadership is heavily focused on the behaviour and personality of the leader, it comes as no surprise that the qualities and traits required of a charismatic leader are at the centre of the theory.

In , Jay Conger and Rabindra Kanungo published Charismatic Leadership , which outlined the key characteristics of a charismatic leader. One thing charismatic leadership emphasizes is the nature of your charisma. Martin Luther King dreamt of a society where everyone is equal, Gandhi wanted different religions to live in peace in India and Sir Winston Churchill wanted the British to stay resilient during the war.

Every charismatic leader has a vision — they are able to look beyond the horizon and imagine a different way of doing things. Being a visionary means being open to chance and understanding that constant improvement is required for progress.

You need to embark on a road of self-improvement, where you are constantly looking to expand your skills and learning things beyond your comfort zone. In addition, you need to listen to other people and understand how their experiences have shaped them. If you can combine your understanding of the world, with the experiences of others, you can visualise new solutions and approaches to solving things.

Visionary people are both dreamers and doers. You want to spend enough time thinking about the world and the problems you face. This video shows you how to develop your vision statement and inspire your subordinates. Charismatic people are good communicators. In order to get people on your side — to understand your vision and to believe in it — you have to be able to share the message loud and clear.

There are two key aspects of articulation in terms of charismatic leadership. First, it simply means being a better communicator and being able to talk about complex issues to people in a way they understand. In the business world, the key is to explain the why , the how , and the when. You need to explain the reason or the vision behind the action, clarify what is needed in order to get to the objective and ensure people know how fast this all should be accomplished.

But the second aspect of articulation and communication relates to the understanding of your subordinates.

Charismatic Leadership Guide: Definition, Qualities, Pros & Cons, Examples

Introduction The purpose of this essay is to identify and analyze two leadership theories in regards to how they contribute to helping leaders, lead and compare and distinguish the difference. This essay will explore 2 main theories of leadership covered in the unit, which are charismatic leadership and transformational theory. This two theories are well known in the filed of leadership. This essay will illustrate leaders who acquire these two main theories and how they used it effectively to achieve. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of some common leadership styles and evaluate how modern managers can best implement them to deal with the challenges they face in the 21st century. The importance of the leadership and its significant impact on the business's performance , productivity of the organization. They could sweet-talk their way out of any situation.

What is Charismatic Leadership? Definition, Characteristics, and Benefits!

Charismatic leaders are visionaries. They have a big dream and work toward making it happen. They look beyond the big picture to see what others are unable to see beyond the horizon. Then they imagine different ways to create a successful result.

Charismatic leaders can weave a spell around workers in ways other leadership styles fail to do. They lead by virtue of their charm and the emotional connections they make with others. Despite their general success in improving the workplace, keeping employees motivated and improving profits, there are some disadvantages of this type of management.

What is Charismatic Leadership?

Advantages of Charismatic Leadership

Instead you have to inspire the next guy down the line and get him to inspire his people. The almost-indescribable characteristic is something we associate with other leaders, while we consider some people simply lacking it. More often than not, charismatic leaders are considered powerful orators with a clear vision. But what is charismatic leadership about? Charisma is a trait often associated with leaders and the world is full of examples of people being described as charismatic leaders.

Click here. Is it a Blessing or a Curse? Discover the advantages and disadvantages of being a charismatic leader, along with the leadership qualities that can round out this leadership style. A charismatic leader is a leader whose followers are attracted to his or her personality and charm. They are masters at inspiring others to feel that they, the leader , are critical to the 'cause' being successful. These magnetic leaders do this through actions such as:.

Charismatic Leadership Style Advantages, Disadvantages and Characteristics

Тогда Стратмор напрягся и рванул тело изо всех сил. Внезапно его швырнуло назад, и он больно ударился спиной о кожух генератора. Пытаясь подняться на ноги, Стратмор в ужасе смотрел на предмет, зажатый в его пальцах: это была рука Чатрукьяна, обломившаяся в локтевом суставе.

1 comments

Leicotdubschi

I have met many different types of people during my career as a leader in three different continents.

REPLY

Leave a comment

it’s easy to post a comment

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>