advantages and disadvantages of mediation pdf

Advantages And Disadvantages Of Mediation Pdf

File Name: advantages and disadvantages of mediation .zip
Size: 1038Kb
Published: 27.05.2021

Mediation and Arbitration are forms of alternative dispute resolution ADR that are intended to avoid the high cost and unpredictable outcome that could result from a lawsuit.

This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of mediation. Mediation is a client-driven process. Here the parties appoint a neutral third party to mediate in a dispute that has arisen between the parties.

Mediation Disadvantages

This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of mediation. Mediation is a client-driven process. Here the parties appoint a neutral third party to mediate in a dispute that has arisen between the parties.

A case can be referred to mediation in the pre-litigation stage or even during litigation if the judge thinks it fit for the case to be referred to a mediator.

Mediation is a completely private endeavour where the parties and their facts are kept confidential. The process of mediation is not based on any code or law. However, there are certain common principals which are followed by the mediators at the time of the mediation session.

Several organizations like the Permanent Court of Arbitration have previously drafted ground rules for the mediators to follow. Mediation was the process of amicable settlement in the past and is the present and future.

Lawyers should advise their clients to try for mediation for resolving their disputes , especially where relationships, like family relationships, business relationships are involved, otherwise, litigation drags on for years and decades often ruining both the parties. This is also the purpose of Section 89 CPC. Mediation as a method of ADR has several advantages as well as disadvantages.

This article aims to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of mediation. One of the major advantages of mediation is that it ensures confidentiality. Confidentiality plays a crucial role in making the parties come to a settlement. Article of the WIPO mediation rules prevents the parties from indulging in any breach of private information disclosed at the time of the proceeding.

In some conventional as well as some contemporary cultures visiting the aegis of the court is looked down upon. These are the people who would rather live in injustice than visit the court. To these kinds of people, mediation serves as a comfortable way to resolve their disputes. Mediation is considered to be a voluntary process to reach a mutual settlement of issues in dispute.

Voluntary generally refers to two important aspects 1. Something that is freely chosen, free participation and freely made agreements between the parties and 2. That there is no force or influence from anywhere regarding the settlement of disputes. This makes the process party-friendly and very adaptable. Therefore, mediation is also considered to be an informal process, where the setting of the proceeding is in the form of discussion.

Since mediation is a voluntary process it is non-coercive in nature, no person holding an influential position can coerce any party to agree to a settlement. Pressure can be created in a mediation process to reach an agreement but until the parties are satisfied no conclusive agreement can be reached. In a mediation procedure, the mediator ensures that the parties do not engage in abusive behaviour whether verbally or otherwise.

In litigation, the atmosphere in the courtroom is intense for the reason that the parties openly hurl abuses at each other. This not only strains their relationship permanently but patronizes the parties.

Mediation can build and improve the relationships of the parties in a disputable cause after the completion of the process of process. The objective of mediation is to let the parties strike a settlement and hence the atmosphere of mediation is similar to a counselling session where the parties can freely discuss things with each other.

The cases where relationships have turned bitter, mediation has been successful in restoring peace and friendly relations between the parties. Negotiation coupled with mediation can be visualized similar to the way a teacher asks two students in conflict to shake their hands in friendship.

Preservation of certain relations is of prime importance for smooth functioning of an organization example- a relation of boss and worker, between co-workers even between two states. The mediation is an informal process whereby the parties participate in meaningful interaction with one another.

The setting and the venue are chosen in a way to facilitate dialogue between the parties. The procedure is friendly without external impediments.

The work of the mediator is to ensure an amicable discussion between the parties. There are no formal procedures to be followed. The process is deliberated upon and chosen by the parties themselves. A sense of comfort prevails which is not possible in the court. Mediation lacks established rules of law to govern its procedural intricacies.

S ince the rules are not present therefore it becomes extremely difficult for framing the entire process of mediation keeping in mind its legal aspect. Since language is a tool for communication, the difference in language and style of communication is the major impediment in cross-culture mediation.

It is difficult to conduct a mediation in which the parties have no knowledge of the language of the opposite party. In addition to it, there is always a possibility of the fallibility of the interpreters. It takes time for such parties to built camaraderie with each other. Every human being identifies themselves with a particular culture.

When parties in mediation have different cultural integrities it is difficult for them to reach a common ground that would pave the way for an agreement. Cultural differences thus act as a major impediment in the successful completion of the mediation process. A situation that arises when two parties are adamant on their point of view.

They do not shift their positions. The probability of reaching common ground dwindles when the parties out of sheer adamancy fail to agree. An impasse is the situation of stagnation reached during the process of mediation where no productive position can be achieved.

It is similar to a session being adjourned sine-die. JSTOR, www. S Krishna Murthy v. Your email address will not be published. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Mediation (Alternative Dispute Resolution)

Mediation, a form of Alternative Dispute Resolution ADR , can be an inexpensive, effective, and peaceful method for resolving conflict between two parties without going to trial. Mediation is a non-confrontational process that involves a neutral individual usually an attorney or retired judge helping the two parties come to a mutually agreed upon solution. Almost any scenario where parties would have a legal dispute could be appropriate for this form of dispute resolution. Mediation can be particularly effective for personal injury disputes, family law, and business disputes. Here is how to determine if mediation is the right form of conflict resolution for you. By opting to use mediation as a dispute resolution technique to solve a conflict, both parties have some control in negotiating the outcomes, as opposed to leaving the result of the case completely in the hands of a judge or jury. Mediation serves as a structured process to help both parties negotiate their own resolution, empowering everyone involved.


So if mediation follows no set procedure, results in no assured outcome, and cannot compel parties to agree unless those parties wish to do so, what advantages.


The Pros and Cons of Mediation - Dispute Resolution Journal - Vol. 52, No. 3

Federal government websites often end in. The site is secure. The process is informal and flexible; attorneys are not necessary. There are no formal rules of evidence and no witnesses.

What is mediation? Mediation is an alternative dispute resolution ADR process in which two or more parties meet with a mediator to resolve their differences and come to an agreeable solution to the problem, such as marital settlement agreements. The mediator is an outside party, hired by the group involved, who advises each side and helps the session come to an end as quickly as possible, which is one of main potential advantages and disadvantages of mediation that a given party may find. The mediator does not render a verdict in favor of one side or the other.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy. They should be the places where the disputes end after alternative methods of resolving disputes have been considered and tried. Courts are an essential institution without which society would end up in chaos. Their importance cannot be emphasized enough, though many of the disputes which arise between individuals or organizations are such that, they are solvable without the interference of the judicial authorities.

Top 5 Benefits of Mediation

Arbitration is a method of resolving disputes without going to court. Sometimes an attorney will recommend arbitration to a client as the best means to resolve a claim. In arbitration, the dispute is submitted to a third party the arbitrator who resolves the dispute after hearing a presentation by both parties.

What are Mediation and Arbitration?

Mediation is one of the method of alternative dispute resolution where third party who is impartial and neutral towards both the parties and help them to resolve their disputes. Mediation is a specialised technique of alternative dispute resolution. Mediation is also a powerful Discovery tool. The roots of mediation can be traced way to the ancient time where the system of Panchayat prevailed.

One of the main disadvantages of mediation is a lack of formal rules, which can make it difficult for two disagreeing parties to reach a compromise. If you're involved in a legal issue that you would prefer to resolve outside of a courtroom, you could use mediation. During mediation, two people who are involved in a legal dispute will meet and attempt to settle a disagreement with the help of a mediator, which is a neutral third party. With mediation, only the parties involved will be responsible for resolving the issue. No outside party will make any decisions. Mediators are not responsible for making a final decision. Instead, mediators help to outline the issue and facilitate communication so that the parties hopefully can agree to a mutually beneficial settlement.

If you are an aggrieved party seeking to take action and resolve a dispute then, depending on the nature of the dispute and any prior agreement between the parties, you may have a choice as to which method of dispute resolution to use. The main dispute resolution processes include litigation, arbitration and mediation. Mediation is a relatively new form of dispute resolution in the UK, but it is gaining momentum as more and more organisations and private individuals come to see its benefits. This process can be used in a number of settings, from employment mediation to family disputes and divorce mediation. Mediation is a form of alternative dispute resolution which is flexible, voluntary and confidential. The specially trained mediator does not take a side nor issue a decision. Instead, the mediator works with both parties, either together or separately, to help achieve a negotiated settlement.


pdf (last visited on Feb. 12, ). Dispute resolution in.


Mediation Disadvantages

0 comments

Leave a comment

it’s easy to post a comment

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>